T is for Tepper and Tolkien

Just a few Ts here and, really, the Tepper list should be a lot longer and should definitely include her novel Grass. My Tubb books I’ll leave for another post.

SHERI TEPPER:
THE ENIGMA SCORE
THE AWAKENERS

J. R. R. TOLKIEN:
THE HOBBIT
THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING
THE TWO TOWERS
THE RETURN OF THE KING

WILSON TUCKER:
THE YEAR OF THE QUIET SUN

GEORGE TURNER:
THE SEA AND SUMMER

S is for Saberhagen and Silverberg

FRED SABERHAGEN:
THE BROKEN LANDS

BROTHER BERSERKER
BERSERKER’S PLANET

JOHN SCALZI:
OLD MAN’S WAR
THE GHOST BRIGADES
THE LAST COLONY

BOB SHAW:
THE WREATH OF STARS
SHIP OF STRANGERS
THE PALACE OF ETERNITY
NIGHT WALK

LUCIUS SHEPARD:
THE GOLDEN

ROBERT SILVERBERG:
THE BEST OF ROBERT SILVERBERG
THE SEED OF EARTH
STOCHASTIC MAN
UNFAMILIAR TERRITORY
THE GATE OF WORLDS
THE OPEN SKY
PROJECT PENDULUM
BORN WITH THE DEAD
TOWER OF GLASS
SF HALL OF FAME (EDITOR)

CLIFFORD D SIMAK:
ALL FLESH IS GRASS
WAYSTATION
CITY
SHAKESPEARE’S PLANET
CEMETERY WORLD

PHIL SMITH:
THE RESURRECTION MACHINE

BRIAN M STABLEFORD:
DAY OF WRATH
JOURNEY TO THE CENTRE
SWAN SONG
RHAPSODY IN BLACK

NEAL STEPHENSON:
CRYPTONOMICON

MICHAEL SWANWICK:
VACUUM FLOWERS

R is for Reynolds and Reed

Last year I was steadily going through my SFF book collection, cataloguing it and photographing it, and putting the pictures and lists up here just for interest. This morning I woke at 5.00 and couldn’t get back to sleep, so I got up, cut my hair, had a shower, then climbed up into the loft and started sorting through those books again. I’d reached the letter P before, so now let’s go on to R.

There’s not many Rs here and looking through my ‘Encyclopedia of Science Fiction’ I can’t see any others I would have wanted to include. Maybe if I had an encyclopedia of fantasy I would have found more, and maybe I should have included Rowling, but they’re Caroline’s books.

ROBERT REED:
MARROW
SISTER ALICE

ALASTAIR REYNOLDS:
CHASM CITY
REVELATION SPACE
ABSOLUTION GAP
REDEMPTION ARC
GALACTIC NORTH
THE PREFECT
PUSHING ICE

MICHAEL SCOTT ROHAN:
THE ANVIL OF ICE
THE FORGE IN THE FOREST
THE HAMMER OF THE SUN

ERIC FRANK RUSSELL:
WASP

Friday 15th

Well, yesterday evening I finished Under the Dome. I read just about all of the last hundred pages, then King’s afterword, and put the book aside. ‘You are sorry when you come to the end’ is the quote from the Daily Express. I wonder if there should have been an elipsis between ‘sorry’ and ‘when’ where the words ‘you even started it’ have been redacted. Apparently the editor cut this book ‘down from the original dinosaur to a beast of slightly more manageable size’. Cue hollow laughter.

Wednesday 13th

Earlier on this year we went to a ‘bring and buy sale’ at someone’s house in Makrigialos. I purchased various plants whilst Caroline picked up a copy of Stephen King’s Duma Key for 50 cents. A couple of weeks ago I picked up that book and started reading, wondering how long it would be before I put it aside again. King has been a disappointment in recent years; his books steadily suffering from an increasing case of bloat. The last I struggled through was Dreamcatcher, which I finished in the sure knowledge that a Peter Lavery pencil would have excised about a third of it. Yet I remember my enjoyment of those earlier books, like The Dead Zone, and how, in my opinion, some of his short stories are the best I’ve ever read.

It is a shame when writers think they have outgrown their editors, when writers start to think they know more than people who are effectively professional readers. It is also a shame when a publisher gives in to a writer who has grown in power or, alternatively, decides what the hell, the name will sell the book so who gives a toss about editing? We’ve all seen the products of these processes, and felt the disappointment.

Duma Key grabbed me and held on, right to the end. Apart from a bit of unclearly visualized monster silliness I enjoyed it very much and felt that King had returned to doing well the stuff he does. The book had that creepy feel with its ‘heart in the mouth’ moments, its ‘laugh out loud’ moments and its moments of ‘now that would make me cry if I wasn’t so macho – sniffle’. After I’d finished it I therefore picked up a book Caroline had bought on the strength of a recommendation from Amazon, and because she hadn’t read something from him in a while. I had been tending to avoid it, seeing as it was the size of a breeze block.

Under the Dome started well and I liked the idea behind it of a small town being cut off from the rest of the world by a force-field. I was also quite surprised when reading the the high praise from various critics to find only one ‘serious ecological undertow’ comment and nary a reference to global warming. Quite refreshing. I then roared through the first hundred or so pages hoping for a stonking good story like The Stand, which this had been compared to, but started to lose headway through the next hundred pages. Reading the hundred pages after that I began to get that ‘oh get on with it’ feeling, and these pages took me only a third of the way in. Another six hundred pages of this to go.

I began to skip bits. Did I really need to know all those details about that person’s life? Yeah, we’ve established that those guys are nasty, can we move on? Erm, where’s the thread of this story gone? Now entering the last three hundred pages I still want to know what will happen and find that reading about one sentence per page keeps my finger on the sluggish pulse. Another bloater. If Dreamcatcher had been cut by a third that would have been no loss, in fact, a considerable gain. Half of Under the Dome needed big black pencil lines through it, whole sections outlined and scribbled over and a warren of bunny rabbits sketched in the margins.